India's Economic Paradox: Winning Votes, Losing Investors · Judge: anthropic:claude-opus-4-8 · 2026-09-05T00:16:55
· ✅ saved (571a8c) · 2 models
🔬 View outputs side-by-side → all verdicts →
| # | Model | Facts | Analogy | Age-fit | Clarity | Quiz | Glossary | Passage | Overall | Cost | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | anthropic:claude-opus-4-8
view ↗ |
9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 17.06¢ | 6.6 | Strong grounding in specific source details (QCOs 14→765, 12% rupee fall, BIT review Feb 2025). The restaurant/kitchen and health-inspector analogies share the actual mechanism (dominance removes accountability pressure). Passage is engaging though truncated mid-sentence with an odd 'agents' field. Quiz is fair and answerable, glossary precise. |
| 🥈 | anthropic:claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
view ↗ |
5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 3.02¢ | 5.4 | Invents several facts not clearly in source: a 'West Bengal' electoral victory, per-capita rank '8th globally', 2015 BIT '2015 revision' framing, and specific IMF appointment details—these look fabricated or embellished. Quiz questions reference text (e.g. 'seeking long-term certainty') not present in the truncated rewritten_passage, so some MCQs aren't answerable from the passage. Analogies are decent but multiple and generic; reading passage is cut off almost immediately. |
| # | Model | Quality | Cost | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | anthropic:claude-opus-4-8 |
9 | 17.06¢ | 6.6 |
| 🥈 | anthropic:claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
6 | 3.02¢ | 5.4 |