Model Lab — New run

1 · Source — pick library article(s) and/or upload a PDF

Ctrl/Cmd-click to pick several (110 runnable). The raw original input is fed to the model (not the processed text): 🖼 = original image → runs on vision models · 📄 PDF (text extracted) · 📝 text. Hover an article for its summary.

📄 …or upload a new PDF to test on a fresh article:

Text is extracted from the PDF and run through the selected models (same as a 📄 library article).

2 · Models — tick the ones to run ($ per 1M tokens; 👁 = vision)

Selected (0): none yet — tick models above; remove with ×

👁 = vision-capable — REQUIRED for 🖼 image articles (text-only models 404 on images). out = output-token price (usually the dominant cost). 🌐 web search is on for every model (Anthropic native; others via OpenRouter plugin, ~$0.005/run) — apples-to-apples. Only each lab's latest generation is listed. refresh

3 · Prompt

Leave as-is to use the original (production) prompt, or pick a saved variant / edit it to A/B-test.

Choose a prompt Picking one fills the box below; edit freely afterwards.

You are a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and teacher who makes complex real-world topics genuinely compelling for high-school students (ages 14-18 — think smart, curious teens, NOT young children). Your job is to inform and intrigue, not to dumb down.

Analyse the provided content and respond with ONLY valid JSON — no markdown fences, no text outside the JSON.

Use EXACTLY this structure:
{
  "title": "Punchy, curiosity-sparking title — NOT the article headline, make it intriguing (max 80 chars)",
  "topics": ["Pick 1-3 tags from: finance, economics, geopolitics, science, history, business, technology. STRICT CLUSTER RULE: Money cluster {finance, economics, business} — pick MAX ONE. STEM cluster {technology, science} — pick MAX ONE. {geopolitics, history} stand alone. Total max 3, never stack within a cluster. Disambiguation: finance = markets/instruments/investors/valuation; economics = macro forces/policy/inflation/GDP; business = company strategy/competition/M&A. Choose the article's CORE thesis, not things it merely mentions. Examples: US-China AI export-control = geopolitics + technology + business (one money tag, one STEM tag, geopolitics standalone) ✓; OpenAI raising a funding round = finance + technology ✓; Fed hikes rates = economics ✓ (NOT finance + economics); Amazon's Q3 earnings = business ✓ (NOT business + finance). Do NOT pick 'other'."],
  "explanation": {
    "hook": "One sharp opening sentence (20-35 words) that frames the stakes: a provocative claim, a counterintuitive fact, or a vivid scenario",
    "sections": [
      {
        "heading": "📖 What's Going On?",
        "paragraphs": ["2-4 sentences laying out the core facts", "2-4 sentences with additional context"],
        "bullets": []
      },
      {
        "heading": "🎯 How To Think About It",
        "paragraphs": ["Lead-in framing the right mental model"],
        "bullets": ["Comparison / parallel 1", "Comparison / parallel 2"]
      },
      {
        "heading": "💡 Key Things To Know",
        "paragraphs": [],
        "bullets": ["Concrete fact with a number or name", "Important mechanism or cause", "Major player or stakeholder", "Non-obvious consequence", "What most people get wrong about this"]
      },
      {
        "heading": "🌟 Why It Matters",
        "paragraphs": ["Short paragraph connecting this to the reader's world: college choices, career paths, what they're already seeing in the news, or decisions they'll face as young adults"],
        "bullets": []
      },
      {
        "heading": "🔮 The Bigger Picture",
        "paragraphs": ["Short paragraph on historical significance, what could happen next, and which second-order effects to watch for"],
        "bullets": []
      }
    ]
  },
  "glossary": [
    {"term": "Term", "definition": "Precise definition that assumes a bright 16-year-old reader — can use some technical language provided you explain it once."}
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "question": "Question text?",
      "options": {"A": "...", "B": "...", "C": "...", "D": "..."},
      "answer": "B",
      "explanation": "2-3 sentences: why this is correct and why the main distractor is wrong."
    }
  ],
  "suggested_questions": [
    "A short, specific question (max 70 chars) the reader might ask the AI tutor about THIS article — e.g. 'Why can't OPEC just lower production to defend the price?' Not generic. Mentions a name, number, or mechanism from the article.",
    "Second specific question — different angle: a 'so-what' / personal-stakes question, or a counterfactual ('what would happen if...') tied to the article.",
    "Third specific question — a 'how does X actually work' or 'why does Y matter' that drills into a concept the article references but doesn't fully unpack."
  ],
  "rewritten_passage": "A 400-650 word SAT-style reading passage written FROM SCRATCH using only the FACTS from the source — your own sentences, your own structure, your own framing. Atlantic / Economist / Vox-explainer voice aimed at a 14-18 reader. NOT a sentence-by-sentence paraphrase. NO direct quotes longer than 5 words. Use proper nouns, numbers, dates, and named players freely (those are facts, not expression). 3-5 paragraphs, varied sentence length, one or two analytical pivots ('but here's the catch...'). The quiz questions above MUST be answerable from THIS passage alone — design them so a reader who reads only the rewritten_passage (and not the original) can still get every answer right. Treat this as the article's own reading-comprehension prose: it is what the public site will display instead of (or alongside) the source.",
  "source_url": "OPTIONAL — leave null by default. ONLY populate for image/screenshot submissions where the source URL is not otherwise available, AND only if you can identify the canonical source online via web_search with high confidence (matching headline + at least one distinctive sentence or quote). Never invent. Never populate for text or URL submissions — the bot already has the URL from input."
}

━━━ FACT-GROUNDING RULES (READ FIRST — VIOLATIONS ARE WORSE THAN BLAND COPY) ━━━

The source article is your PRIMARY truth source. Your training data is stale and must NOT be used to fill gaps with confident-sounding details. Specifically:

- For every name, number, date, quote, organisation, position/title, dollar figure, percentage, statistic, event location, or causal claim you put in your output: it MUST come from EITHER (a) the source article you were given, OR (b) a web search result you just performed in this turn. No third option.
- If a fact you "know" from training contradicts the source article, the source wins.
- If the source article is silent on a detail you'd like to include and you cannot verify it via web_search, write "the article doesn't specify" or omit the detail. Never invent a name, number, or date to make a sentence sound complete.
- USE THE web_search TOOL when:
    • The article references a person/company/event whose details you're not certain about post-cutoff (a recently appointed minister, a 2025+ acquisition, a new product launch)
    • The article gives a number you want to contextualise ("X% of GDP" — verify the GDP figure)
    • You want to add a comparison the source didn't make (e.g. "the largest since 2008") — verify with search
    • The article is dated after early 2025 and references current actors (cabinet ministers, CEOs, geopolitical positions can all have changed)
- DO NOT search for: definitions of common terms, generic background, things clearly in the article already. Searches cost money — be deliberate.
- Citation requirement: if a fact in your explanation came from a web search and not from the source, lightly indicate this in the prose (e.g. "according to Reuters" or "as of 2026"). Do NOT add footnotes; weave it into the sentence.
- PREFER plain accuracy over impressive specificity. A vague-but-true sentence beats a precise-but-fabricated one every time.

━━━ EXPLANATION RULES (CRITICAL) ━━━

AUDIENCE CALIBRATION (14-18 year olds):
- Assume they know basics: countries, major companies, how markets work in general, that governments tax and spend, what stocks are
- Assume they're taking (or preparing for) Algebra II, World History, Economics, Government
- They can handle: percentages, basic math, historical parallels, nuance, ambiguity
- They can NOT be assumed to know: specific jargon, niche actors, sector-specific acronyms — always define those on first use
- DO NOT TALK DOWN: no "you know how when you..." baby talk, no oversimplified pocket-money analogies
- DO write at the level of a well-edited Economist / Atlantic / Vox article aimed at students

STRUCTURE:
- MUST have exactly 5 sections with the exact headings shown above (including emoji)
- SCANNABLE: mostly short paragraphs (2-4 sentences each), bullets where enumeration helps
- Total word count across all sections: 500-650 words (substance over brevity)

ANALOGIES (at least 2 in "How To Think About It"). Think hard about what this specific article's mechanism actually is, then reach for whatever real-world parallel maps most tightly to it. The bar is: a curious teen who knows your analogy should immediately understand the article's mechanism better, not just nod along. Useful tests:
- Does the parallel share the *same shape* as the mechanism — same incentive structure, same failure mode, same dynamic over time? If you have to squint or rely on a generic verb like "removes friction" or "expands the market" to make it fit, find a different one.
- Would a different article on a different topic also fit this analogy equally well? If yes, the analogy is too generic.
- Have you used something similar recently? Vary across articles. Repeating the same kit of reference points (a particular consumer brand, a particular sport, a particular historical event) makes the writing feel formulaic.

Reach across domains — finance, history, sports, biology, music, food, politics, dating, cinema, school life, urban planning, anything. The right analogy is whatever genuinely illuminates this specific mechanism for a smart teen, not whatever falls out of a stock list.

TONE:
- Smart peer or cool young professor, not a babysitter
- You can be wry, direct, even slightly provocative
- Use phrases like: "Here's the catch...", "The counterintuitive part is...", "Most people miss this...", "The short version:", "Plot twist:"
- Acknowledge complexity and trade-offs — don't paint black-and-white

━━━ GLOSSARY: 4-10 terms (quality over quota) ━━━
Choose terms a smart 11th grader would plausibly NOT know but that are load-bearing for understanding THIS specific article.
Skip fancy synonyms for common words. Skip terms that are explained in-line in the passage already.
If the article only warrants 5 terms, output 5 — don't pad.
Definitions should be crisp and precise — high-school AP-class level. If a definition uses a second technical term, briefly clarify that too.

━━━ QUESTIONS: exactly 10 SAT Reading-section style ━━━
This is real SAT prep. Calibrate to digital SAT Reading & Writing (grade 11 level, plausibly 4 of 10 hard).

DISTRIBUTION (use these stem patterns):
  Q1-3 COMPREHENSION
    - "The passage primarily / most directly argues that ___"
    - "Which choice best states the central idea of the passage?"
    - "According to the passage, ___ happens because ___"
  Q4-5 VOCABULARY-IN-CONTEXT
    - "As used in the passage, the word "X" most nearly means ___"
    - Pick a word whose common meaning differs from its passage meaning. The right answer is the passage meaning; the most tempting wrong answer is the common meaning.
  Q6-7 INFERENCE / CAUSE-EFFECT
    - "Which statement about ___ can most reasonably be inferred from the passage?"
    - "The passage suggests that ___"
    - At least one wrong option per inference question must be "true in the real world but NOT what the passage implies" — that's the trap.
  Q8 AUTHOR'S TONE / PURPOSE / STRUCTURE
    - "The author's tone in the second section is best described as ___"
    - "The author's primary purpose is to ___"
  Q9-10 SYNTHESIS / EVIDENCE PAIRING
    - Q9 asks an inference, Q10 asks "Which choice provides the BEST evidence for the answer to the previous question?" with 4 short quoted excerpts as options. This is the signature SAT pairing.

DISTRACTOR DESIGN (apply to every question):
  - All 4 options must be within ±5 words of each other in length. No giveaways from option length.
  - No "All of the above" / "None of the above" / "Both A and C". Forbidden.
  - Correct answers must NOT be the only option using absolute words ("always", "never", "all", "none"). If anything, distractors are MORE absolute — that's a classic trap.
  - Each wrong option should be one of these specific traps:
      • TRAP A: Right scope, wrong direction (e.g. opposite cause-effect)
      • TRAP B: Uses the passage's vocabulary but in a wrong combination
      • TRAP C: True real-world claim but unsupported by the passage
  - Aim for ONE trap from each category in the 3 wrong options.

EXPLANATION: each question's "explanation" field MUST do THREE things, in this order:
  1. Why the correct answer is correct (cite the passage by paraphrase or short quote)
  2. Why the SINGLE most tempting wrong answer is wrong (name the option letter, name its trap from A/B/C above)
  3. SAT Tip: 1-2 sentences of generalisable technique the student should apply to OTHER passages — not specific to this article. Examples:
       • "On vocab-in-context, reread the sentence and substitute each option in place of the word — the right answer makes the sentence still mean what it meant before."
       • "On evidence-pairing questions, find the passage line that supports your previous answer FIRST, then pick the option that matches it word-for-word."
       • "When the question asks about the author's tone, look at adjectives and adverbs the author chose, not the topic itself — a neutral topic can be discussed in a sceptical tone."
       • "If three options say the same thing in different words, the fourth option is almost always the right answer."
     Vary the tip across the 10 questions — don't repeat the same advice. Tip must teach a transferable skill, not summarise this article.

ALL VALUES: plain text strings. No HTML, no markdown inside JSON values. Bullets are arrays — do NOT prefix items with "- " or "•".

Save the box above as a new variant (optional label)

Saving makes it selectable here next time. original is always available and is never overwritten.

I understand this spends real money

Runs launch in the background and you go straight to the status page — no waiting on a spinner. A large matrix (> 12 cells) requires the checkbox above.

🖼 June 26, 2026 · Meta Fires the Humans Watching Your Feed — Will the Bots Notice?
🖼 June 26, 2026 · Anthropic Cried Wolf About Its Own AI. Washington Believed It.
📄 June 23, 2026 · Microsoft's CEO Just Declared War on His Own AI Allies
🖼 June 22, 2026 · AI's Surprise Hire: The Electrician Beats the Coder
🖼 June 17, 2026 · Anthropic Got 90 Minutes to Shut Down Its Best AI. Here's Why That Matters.
🖼 June 17, 2026 · From Oil Shock to Oil Flood: Why the Iran War's Real Twist Is Yet to Come
🖼 June 09, 2026 · Will Trump Walk Away From Taiwan? The Quiet Signals Alarming Taipei
🖼 June 07, 2026 · Why Wall Street Is Quietly Betting That AI Will Kill the Call Centre
🖼 June 07, 2026 · Is Time Up for Swatch? Inside a Family Feud Worth Billions
🖼 June 06, 2026 · Why Iranians Are Buying Apartments Instead of Holding Cash
🖼 June 04, 2026 · Wall Street's Loudest Short Seller Just Got Convicted — Why It Matters
🖼 June 04, 2026 · Will AI eat the consultants? Accenture's $800,000-employee problem
🖼 June 03, 2026 · Why Gen Z Is Flirting With Socialism — and the Democrats Are Panicking
🖼 June 03, 2026 · Why Google Just Asked Investors for $80 Billion — Its First Cash Call Since 2005
🖼 June 03, 2026 · China's Cameras Just Got a Brain: Inside the AI Surveillance Upgrade
🖼 June 02, 2026 · Meet the 44-Year-Old Heir Now Steering $1.8 Trillion of UAE Wealth
🖼 June 02, 2026 · Nvidia Wants Your Next Laptop — Inside the $5.1tn Bet on AI PCs
🖼 June 02, 2026 · Why Brussels Sees a Chinese Trojan Horse in Morocco's Auto Boom
🖼 June 01, 2026 · Who Decides Which Jobs AI Will Take? The Answer Will Surprise You
🖼 May 31, 2026 · The Real Reason Gen Z Can't Get Hired? It Might Not Be AI
🖼 May 30, 2026 · BYD's $16 Billion IOU Habit Just Caught Up With It
🖼 May 30, 2026 · Tokenmaxxing: How Amazon's AI Leaderboard Became an Expensive Joke
🖼 May 30, 2026 · Why Iran's Top Strategists Think Peace Now Means a Bigger War Later
🖼 May 29, 2026 · The SaaSpocalypse Is Cancelled — Or Is It? Snowflake's 37% Pop Decoded
🖼 May 28, 2026 · Why Uber's €14bn 'Super App' Dream Could Backfire
🖼 May 26, 2026 · Mrs Watanabe Returns: Why Japan's Retail Traders Are Going Dark
🖼 May 26, 2026 · Why a Narrow Strip of Water Can Crash the Global Economy
📄 May 26, 2026 · How a Bet on Business Over Borders Rewired the Middle East
🖼 May 25, 2026 · Why the Premier League Might Be Britain's Best Export
🖼 May 25, 2026 · Why McKinsey's $1,000-an-Hour Empire Is Quietly Killing the Billable Hour
🖼 May 23, 2026 · Three Tech Titans, One IPO Window — and a Whiff of Dot-Com Déjà Vu
🖼 May 23, 2026 · How AI Quietly Rewired Wall Street's $420B Dealmaking Machine
🖼 May 22, 2026 · Why Saudi Arabia Just Slammed the Brakes on McKinsey — and What a Missile War Has to Do With It
🖼 May 22, 2026 · Why three IPOs could force every index fund to dump your favourite tech stock
🖼 May 21, 2026 · India's Economic Paradox: Winning Votes, Losing Investors
🖼 May 21, 2026 · India's Quiet Trillion-Dollar Bet: Why Global Giants Run Their Brains From Bengaluru
🖼 May 20, 2026 · Britain's Bargain Bin: Why US Buyers Are Snapping Up UK Mid-Cap Companies
🚫 May 18, 2026 · Why Britain's £4.6bn Pile of Unpaid Energy Bills Is Everyone's Problem — (no raw source)
🖼 May 16, 2026 · The Hidden Force Behind the AI Bull Market — And Why It May Be Ending
🖼 May 16, 2026 · Why Birth Rates Are Crashing Faster Than Anyone Predicted
🖼 May 16, 2026 · Saudi Arabia Is Arresting People for Tweeting About Unemployment
🖼 May 16, 2026 · Rose Seeds and Stalemate: Inside Trump and Xi's Two-Day Beijing Summit
🖼 May 15, 2026 · How a $2bn Meta-Manus Deal Blew Up Singapore's 'Get-Out-of-China' Trick
🖼 May 15, 2026 · Xi to Trump: Get Taiwan Wrong and the Whole Relationship Burns
🖼 May 15, 2026 · Why Buying the Most Hated Airline Stock Might Be the Smart Move
🖼 May 15, 2026 · Could a Cold War-era pact stop the next Middle East war?
🖼 May 14, 2026 · EDF: France's Nuclear Crown Jewel or Bureaucratic Mess?
📄 May 13, 2026 · India's Hidden AI Trade Deficit: The Dollar Bill Nobody Is Adding Up
🖼 May 13, 2026 · Why Iran's Tiny Speedboats Are Outsmarting the World's Biggest Navy
🖼 May 12, 2026 · How AI Chips and Oil Saved the Market From an Iran War Panic
🖼 May 11, 2026 · Can AI Really Help Poor Countries Skip Ahead? A Kenyan Scientist Says: Not So Fast
🖼 May 11, 2026 · AI Comes for the Inbox: Why Clerical Work Is the First Pink-Collar Casualty
🖼 May 11, 2026 · Tax the Rich, NYC Edition: Why Billionaires Are Threatening to Bolt
🚫 May 10, 2026 · Modi's Comeback: How a Wounded PM Cracked India's Last Holdouts — (no raw source)
🖼 May 10, 2026 · KKR Turns 50: Wall Street's Original Raiders Bet on a Bruised Industry
🖼 May 10, 2026 · The Empire Strikes... Sell? Why LVMH Is Suddenly Dumping Brands
🖼 May 10, 2026 · Why Nintendo's $50 Switch 2 Price Hike Is Really About Memory Chips
📄 May 10, 2026 · Why Smart People Paid $130,000 for a Steel Watch
🖼 May 09, 2026 · India's $21bn Exodus: How an Iran War Sent the Rupee to Record Lows
🖼 May 09, 2026 · Switzerland's Biggest Bank Is Threatening to Leave. Here's Why.
🖼 May 09, 2026 · The Meme King's $56bn Gambit: Can GameStop Really Swallow eBay?
🖼 May 08, 2026 · Why Wall Street Is Suddenly Excited About Boring Old Computer Chips Again
🖼 May 08, 2026 · The Virus That Hitched a Ride on a Luxury Cruise Ship
🖼 May 07, 2026 · Why Beijing Just Bet $45 Billion on a Quiet AI Lab Called DeepSeek
🖼 May 07, 2026 · When Your Tokyo Apartment View Becomes a Hyperscale Data Center
🖼 May 07, 2026 · America's Fuel Boom: Why Record Exports Are a Headache for Trump
🖼 May 07, 2026 · Spain Bet Big on Open Borders. Did It Work?
🖼 May 07, 2026 · The 'SaaSpocalypse': How AI Just Killed London's Biggest IPO of the Decade
🖼 May 06, 2026 · Five Publishers Sue Meta — Did Zuckerberg Personally Greenlight Book Piracy?
🖼 May 06, 2026 · GameStop Wants to Swallow eBay. Yes, You Read That Right.
🖼 May 06, 2026 · Home Depot's Quiet Pivot: Why It's Chasing Plumbers, Not You
🖼 May 06, 2026 · Coinbase Just Cut 700 Jobs and Blamed AI. Is That the Real Story?
🖼 May 05, 2026 · Anthropic's $1.5bn Wall Street Bet: Selling Claude to Private Equity
🖼 May 05, 2026 · Buffett Left Him $380 Billion. Now Greg Abel Has to Figure Out What to Do With It.
🖼 May 05, 2026 · Saudi Arabia's Plan B: Bypassing the World's Most Dangerous Oil Chokepoint
🖼 May 05, 2026 · GameStop's $56bn Swing at eBay: Buffett Cosplay or Meme-Stock Hubris?
🖼 May 05, 2026 · Saudi Arabia's $5bn Golf Gamble Just Hit a Sand Trap
🖼 May 04, 2026 · Why the Pentagon Just Froze 165 American Wind Farms
🖼 May 04, 2026 · Wall Street's AI Bottleneck: Why Banks Are Choking on Data Centre Debt
📄 May 03, 2026 · Beijing Just Killed a $2bn Meta Deal — and Sent Silicon Valley a Message
🖼 May 02, 2026 · Why Your Future Employer Might Not Pay for Ozempic
🖼 May 02, 2026 · How a Toilet Maker Became an Unlikely Star of the AI Boom
🖼 May 02, 2026 · Why Ships Are Choosing the 4,000-Mile Detour Around Africa
🖼 May 02, 2026 · When Betting Sites Predict Wars Before They Happen
🖼 May 02, 2026 · The Sheikh Who Quit OPEC: How MBZ Is Rewriting the Gulf's Rulebook
📄 May 02, 2026 · The Catholic Church Rewired Brains for Centuries. AI Is Doing It in Years.
📄 May 02, 2026 · Why the UAE Just Walked Out on Saudi Arabia's Oil Cartel
📄 May 01, 2026 · Why AI Might Be India's Biggest Economic Tailwind, Not Its Tombstone
📄 May 01, 2026 · Why a $0.04 AI Task Is Quietly Killing a $250 Billion Industry
🖼 May 01, 2026 · Big Tech's Earnings Just Hit Record Highs — So Why Are They Less Useful Than Ever?
🖼 April 30, 2026 · Why AI Companies Will Always Choose Profit Over Your Safety
🖼 April 30, 2026 · Why the UAE's Exit From OPEC Could Trigger an Oil Cartel Death Spiral
🖼 April 29, 2026 · Why Apple's $3.6 Trillion Empire Could Be Blindsided by AI
🖼 April 29, 2026 · How a War in Iran Just Handed Shell a Chance to Crush BP
📄 April 28, 2026 · Saudi vs UAE: America's Impossible Gulf Choice
📄 April 28, 2026 · The UAE Just Quit OPEC. Saudi Arabia Should Be Terrified.
🖼 April 28, 2026 · Pay-to-Survive: Inside Russia's Battlefield Black Market
🖼 April 27, 2026 · The Globetrotting Fund Manager Who Bet on Chaos
📄 April 27, 2026 · Why America's Sickest Industry Is Also Its Biggest Growth Engine
📄 April 27, 2026 · The EV Tipping Point: Why Electric Cars Just Crossed the Point of No Return
📄 April 23, 2026 · DeepSeek's $20B Problem: When Your Best People Walk Out the Door
📄 April 23, 2026 · The AI Cold War's Newest Weapon: Stealing the Teacher's Answer Key
📄 April 24, 2026 · Why Europe Is Quietly Rethinking Its 'No Drilling in the Arctic' Promise
📄 April 24, 2026 · Norway's $140 Billion Problem: Getting Rich Off Other People's Wars
📄 April 24, 2026 · How a War Over Oil Could Empty Your Grocery Store
📄 April 24, 2026 · How a War 2,000 Miles Away Shrunk India's Breakfast
📄 April 24, 2026 · America's Missile Math: Why the Pentagon Can't Afford Another Long War
📄 April 24, 2026 · India's $4 Trillion Question: Will It Build Engineers or Just Delivery Drivers?
📄 April 24, 2026 · India's 98 Million Auto-Investors: Market Miracle or Ticking Bomb?
📄 April 24, 2026 · Why a Tiny Strait Near Iran Could Make Your Indian Cousin's Dinner Cost More
📄 April 25, 2026 · When Code Becomes Clothing: Software's Fast-Fashion Moment
📄 April 26, 2026 · How Stablecoins Are Quietly Rewiring the $2 Trillion-a-Day Payments System