India's Economic Paradox: Winning Votes, Losing Investors · Judge: anthropic:claude-opus-4-8 · 2026-09-04T06:34:55
· ✅ saved (d6dc1e) · 2 models
🔬 View outputs side-by-side → all verdicts →
| # | Model | Facts | Analogy | Age-fit | Clarity | Quiz | Glossary | Passage | Overall | Cost | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | anthropic:claude-opus-4-8
view ↗ |
9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 8.6 | 17.06¢ | 6.3 | Facts are specific and consistent (12% rupee fall, QCOs 14→765, Sitharaman Feb 2025, BIT courts-before-arbitration). Restaurant/kitchen and 'call the health inspector' analogies genuinely share the mechanism. Quiz is fair and SAT-styled. The rewritten_passage is truncated mid-sentence, and the odd 'agents' field looks like a passage fragment escaped its container, hurting passage quality. |
| 🥈 | anthropic:claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
view ↗ |
5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 6.1 | 3.02¢ | 5.5 | Introduces several likely-invented specifics not clearly in source: 'West Bengal victory,' 'per capita rank 8th,' '2015 BIT exit clauses,' Bhalla's exact IMF/PMEAC roles — these read as fabricated or over-precise. Analogies (student president, restaurant, football) are good. But several quiz items quote 'evidence' passages that don't appear in the truncated rewritten_passage, making them unanswerable, and the passage is cut off almost immediately. |
| # | Model | Quality | Cost | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | anthropic:claude-opus-4-8 |
8.6 | 17.06¢ | 6.3 |
| 🥈 | anthropic:claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
6.1 | 3.02¢ | 5.5 |